- Blueprint
- Posts
- š§š¼āš Blueprint 032
š§š¼āš Blueprint 032
Content minutes, time allocators, dots on the map, boredom, Steve Jobs
Welcome back to Blueprint, a weekly series where I share an unfiltered, behind-the-scenes look into my journey as a full-time entrepreneur & creator. Itās everything Iāve learned, open sourced for free, forever.
Itās been 32 weeks (8 months) since I started world building full-time.
Todayās topics:
š | Week 32 recap and 8 month snapshot
ā±ļø | Time allocators
š§® | Content minutes
šŗļø | Dots on the map
š„± | I miss being bored
A reminder that the internet game is not zero-sum. Everyone reading this can win at an unlimited scale. Iām writing this for the internet astronauts building their own worlds. If thatās youā¦letās ride š©š»āš
BLUEPRINT VIDEO
Visual Blueprints
I made the first video version of Blueprint! Link to watch here
I think this could be an amazing format to share weekly on YouTube.
Will need to hire an editor to be able to ship these in tandem with the email version weekly.
Would love to get feedback on how the video version resonates with you and if youād look forward to watching it weekly. Give it a watch and lmk.
WEEKLY RECAP
Quick Recap (from the trenches)
Felt a bit of burn out for the first time this week.
I typically function like a robot that can work endlessly without fatiguing (if inspired to do so). But this week, I ran into a wall.
Upon reflection, it stemmed from two things:
Skipping my daily health routine (for too many days in a row)
Spending too much time on low leverage, poor fit tasks
On the health side, Iāve found that if I (a) stay hydrated, (b) workout daily, and (c) sleep well, Iām a machine for creative and tactical execution.
Eating well helps too, but I can get away with poor nutrition here and there. The other 3 are non-negotiables.
This week, I skipped workouts, stayed up late, ate terribly, etc. The behavior of a madman playing a short-term game.
When you play long-term, you donāt make these daily sacrifices because you realize you have endless game left to play.
On the ālow leverage, poor fitā side of things, I had a realization (and a framework) that may help creators.
In the business world, most investors and high-level CEOs refer to themselves as capital allocators.
Their only job is to allocate where resources goā¦to put their organization/fund/project in the best position to return capital to shareholders.
Similarly, as a creator, your primary role is a time allocator.
There are dozens of channels and hundreds of ways you can spend your time across different formats.
You only job is to figure out the optimal mix of time spend that maximizes your ability to build depth and trust with your audience.
The entire role of a content creator boils down to this one idea.
If you were to map all tasks that a creator needs to do, itād be a 2Ć2 matrix of leverage vs fit (this is similar to a previous concept I shared called the Solo Matrix).
Essentially, as a creator, your goal is to find the things that are high leverage (a good return on time) and you like doing (a fun way to spend time). These live in the upper right box.
Everything else should be automated or hired away.
What I didnāt realize when I originally made this chart, was how much the fit/fun variable mattered.
I assumed that fit was a ānice-to-haveā and I could just brute force my through things that had high leverage but poor fit.
Turns out that spending my time on those tasks (the ones that were poor fit) actually crushed my productivity everywhere else, because it burned me out.
Think of it like a bad apple ruining the whole batch.
I donāt need to get into exactly what those tasks were, but the lesson is thisā¦
As a creator, doing things you donāt like doing (but think you should), will likely lead to you doing less of the things you actually like doing. And if thereās one thing I know about this game, itās that the only way to win is by doing things you actually like doing, for years, consistently.
Be a time allocator.
ā ā ā ā ā ā ā ā ā ā
As I reflected on previous newsletters, I realized I donāt do a great job of providing snapshots for where things actually are (e.g., strategy, channels, income approach, etc.). I share a lot of little ideas and thought nuggets, but itād be hard for someone reading back through the archive to easily track how my strategy changed over time.
So every 4 episodes, Iām going to drop a quick section around my current thinking.
8 month snapshot:
1. Target content mix/cadence:
Shorts (3-4/week) [mix of business meets tech/culture & creator frameworks]
Pod (1 full ep/week + 1 clip)
YouTube (1-2/week) [Blueprint vlogs + creator frameworks]
Email (1/week)
IG stories (daily)
Tweets (daily)
2. Monetization strategy:
Week 32 was first 5-figure week
Current revenue streams in focus:
CPMs: Atuomatic through Tiktok/YouTube
Affiliate: Turned on where relevant in Youtube videos
Brand Deals: Super selective to only take brand deals where Iām excited to do it and itās a perfect overlap with existing content
Brand Consulting: Working with 2-3 brands on content strategy, scriptwriting, video feedback, etc. (max 2 hours per day)
Video Agency: Lead gen + strategy/storytelling consulting
Waiting on:
Digital, software & physical products
3. Major focuses moving forward:
Spend less time doing low fit tasks (to solve, Iām hiring YouTube editors, thumbnail/packaging team)
Find better time allocation in content mix and continue producing consistently
4. Biggest realizations:
I shouldnāt do things creatively that I donāt want to do. If I feel burnt out, everything suffers
My unique background (strategy consulting + creative ability) is extremely valuable to brands, much moreso than I realized. Building a productized agency around this (with the right operator) would almost certainly succeed
I actually enjoy making wknds vlogs style stories, being a guest on podcasts, and recording walk-and-talk IG stories. I should do more of this
CONTENT MINUTES
Content Minutes
Content minutes is a first-cousin to the ātime allocatorā concept above.
Itās a super helpful frame for thinking about the efficiency of building fandom.
Think of every minute someone spends consuming your content as an individual block of timeā¦a one-minute blockā¦a content minute.
You goal as a creator is to convert that person from a stranger ā passive viewer ā follower ā fan ā die-hard fanatic
I call this āfan journeyā the road to fandom.
To advance a potential fan through the fandom funnel, each level requires a different quantity of content minutes consumed.
In other words, maybe to convert a person from a passive viewer to a die-hard fanatic, it takes 90 content minutes.
Those content minutes can be consumed a variety of ways.
Tweets/IG stories = .5 content minutes
Short-form videos = 1 content minute
Email newsletter = 2-5 content minutes
YouTube videos = 10-20 content minutes
Podcasts = 40-60 content minutes
Livestreams = 60-120 content minutes
As a creator, and a time allocator, your job is to make this conversion process happen as efficiently as possible, meaning the fewest unique consumption sessions for them and the least amount of time spent making for you.
Said another way, āWhat is the least amount of time you can spend making content that will accomplish this conversion?ā
Hereās how long it takes me to make each type of content aboveā¦
Tweets/IG stories = 5 minutes
Short-form videos = 2-5 hours
Email newsletter = 2-4 hours
YouTube videos = 8-10 hours (without an editor)
Podcasts = 2 hours (with an editor)
Livestreams = 1:1 with time streamed
If you look at the efficiency ratio of each at lower end (content minutes created : min. time spent), itād look something like this:
Tweets/IG stories = 1/10
Short-form videos = 1/120
Email newsletter = 1/60
YouTube videos = 1 /48
Podcasts = 1/3
Livestreams = 1/1
Looking at these ratios, itās clear that the channels on the barbells (podcasts, livestreams, tweets, IG stories) are the most efficient to create relative to the content minutes they produce.
So why doesnāt everyone just do only these?
The one huge variable not taken into account here is discoverability, or the absolute total content units consumed per piece of new content.
If you start livestreaming or podcasting today, it may be an āefficientā way to create content minutes, but very few people will actually be consuming those minutes (because of low organic discoverability).
For something like a short-form video, it may be low efficiency, but I can have 1M people consume that content minute within the first 48 hours of posting.
So then what do I do?
Hereās the big aha moment thatāll really make you scratch your head.
The goal of a creator is not to get the highest number of people with at least one content minute consumedā¦the goal is to get the most people across the red pill line for die-hard fanatic (e.g., 90+ content minutes consumed)
The goal is not breadthā¦itās depth.
As a creator looking to make a living from this, youāre better off with fewer unique content minute consumers but more across the red pill line.
And this is where short-form video can be a trap (unless you do it for a long-time).
For me, thereās a good chance that more than 20M unique people have at least 1 content minute consuming my stuff.
But how many have over 100 content minutes? Iād guess the number is in the 4-figures (1,000-9,999).
For me, to make 250 content minutes via short-form video, at my desired quality, itād take me ~1000 hours.
To make that same 250 content minutes through podcasts with Roberto, itād take me ~4 hours.
Clearly, Iāve been allocating my time in a suboptimal way (if Iām optimizing for die hard fanatics, which I am).
So if youāre like me, what do we do about this?
The goal is to use high reach/low content minute channels to transport more people to low reach/high content minute channels.
The classic, āget them from IG/Tiktok ā YouTube/podcast.ā Itās much easier said than done.
But based on the above, Iād probably be better off spending 5x more time figuring out how to transport people and 1/5 the time on actually making the low efficiency content.
DOTS ON THE MAP
Dots on the map
One of Steve Jobs's most notable speeches is his 2005 Stanford commencement address.
In it, he talks about āconnecting the dotsā and famously describes how he took a calligraphy class at Reed College.
At the time, he was just pursuing his authentic interests and natural drift. Taking the class wasnāt a calculated maneuverā¦it was just Steve being Steve.
Looking back, everybody could clearly see how that experience influenced the font design for all Apple computers.
The dots only connect looking backwards is the infamous lesson.
But to me, this is only half of the lesson.
The other half, is that you actually need to put unique dots on the map for there to be something novel to connect.
Dots are authentic, organic experiences that you want to pursue. Itās what you find interesting and cool.
Too many people curate their life with a backdrop of, āWould others find this cool?ā
This leads them to plot the same dots as everyone elseā¦meaning when they go to connect those dots later, their lines arenāt unique.
The āSteve Jobs likeā revelations come from the uniqueness of the dots.
Hereās a funny story about how this relates to meā¦
When I graduated college, I worked as a consultantā¦and hated it.
Before that, I had been creative & spontaneous. Consulting was sandpaper that ground me down into a uniform cog.
To resist this convergence to the middle, I started rapping in my hotel room when I was on the road.
Every night, no matter what time I got back from the office, I wouldnāt sleep until I finished a song.
An intro, 2 verses and 2 hooks.
I had been freestyling in college at parties, but never made proper music. I had no idea what I was doing, but was determined to figure it out.
After many months doing this, I self-produced my first album, Misunderstood.
On Spotify, the 3rd song Cool Cool was up to 100K plays (sadly the album isnāt on Spotify anymore).
At the time, making music was my escape hatchā¦a creative outlet.
I never truly believed I was going to become a professional rapper, just that there was power in learning how to dream things in my head and create them from nothing.
But fast forward seven years and now I make videos, delivered in a bit of a unique styleā¦almost as if Iām rapping or speaking the words rhythmically.
I also write in metaphors, and frame my thoughts in layers, kind of like a rap verse.
Because of my experience as a rapper, I understand writing and delivering vocals in a unique way.
This is me connecting the dots looking backwards.
It would have been easier for me to have never made music.
I didnāt know how to do it, my friends made fun of me for it, and it was an unlikely road to monetize in any significant way.
But I did it anywaysā¦I put the dot on the map.
I MISS BEING BORED
I miss being bored
The longer I play this game, the more I realize that my best ideas come from empty space.
Boredom. The nothingness between the somethings.
And lately Iāve noticed that Iām less bored than Iāve ever been.
I miss it.
My lack of boredom is coming from two things:
Microfillers
Invisible ripples
Tbh I just love making up random phrases for things and seeing what sticks lol
Microfillers are the 2-10 minute random pockets during the day that we used to use to reset our brains.
Maybe itās walking from one place to anotherā¦or getting the mailā¦or going to the bathroomā¦or cooking lunch.
These pockets used to be breaksā¦a time where we could let our mind wander and be bored throughout the day.
Lately, Iāve found that I immediately reach for my phone to mindlessly scroll or put something on in the background.
Microfillers.
And the worst part is the mental gymnastics I go through to justify to myself why Iām doing it.
In my head, if Iām not constantly looking at stuff, then Iām probably missing something great that could be giving me an edge, or an idea for a new video I could use later.
Of course we all know that most of what we see/read is garbageā¦static hidden beneath more static.
These microfillers suck up our boredom time.
The other thing eating my boredom are the invisible ripples, or hidden hangovers that content leaves us with once you stop consuming it.
For example, letās say you were listening to a podcast on your walk to the gym, but thereās 5 minutes left when you arrive.
Itās not as though once you press pause your mind completely shuts that session down.
Instead, both the concepts you listened to and the mystery of what remains is still rippling around in your head.
Even though you arenāt actively listening to anything, youāre still passively thinking about it.
And thatās filling space in your mind when you could be bored.
The combination of these things, over the course of a day, happens hundreds of times and fill almost every open pocket of silence.
I feel myself frying my dopamine sensors on a daily basis because of it.
Collectively as a society, our phone addiction is a much bigger problem than anyone realizes.
I donāt have a cure or a hackā¦Iām just as addicted as you are.
But I miss being bored.
CONTENT FROM THIS WEEK
My best content from this week:
š® | Finding the greatest taco in San Diego: Watch
š° | Why will phones not exist in 2035: Watch
š¤ | This Lipsync AI demo is wild: Watch
š¦ | wknds podcast (015) - OpenAI's new launch of Sora, why LLMs have gotten less useful, the AI hardware race, Kallaway's creator success equation, speed vs weird: Watch / Listen
š§š¼āš | Blueprint 031 [video] - Avoiding the "spread too thin" trap, a foolproof playbook for beginner creators, Novak Djokovic and "hitting the ball, why the MKBHD x Ridge partnership is a new brand collab model for creators: Read / Watch
š„µ | Guest appearance on Sweat Equity [video] - My backstory and best ideas around content creation/building: Watch
LOVING BLUEPRINT?
Best way to help me grow is to share this with a friend you think would like it. Appreciate the loveš«¶